Menyoal Validitas Sadd Al-Dharai‘ sebagai Dalil Hukum Islam: Polemik Epistemologis Ushuliyyin

Questioning the Validity of Sadd Al-Dharai' as an Islamic Legal Argument: Ushuliyyin Epistemological Polemics

Authors

  • Sansan Ziaul Haq Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53491/alaqwal.v3i02.1035

Keywords:

sadd al-dharai‘ , epistemological polemic, Islamic legal evidence, ushuliyyin.

Abstract

This paper will discuss the discourse of sadd al-dharai‘  as an evidence of Islamic law along with various epistemological perspectives that underlie the differences of opinion regarding its jurisprudential position. Using the content analysis method and normative-philosophical approach, a qualitative reading of the research data shows that the polemic of ushuliyyin regarding the validity of sadd al-dharai‘  is caused by differences of opinion regarding whether or not it is permissible to judge haram an act that is permissible but can lead to haram based on strong suspicion (dzann). Meanwhile, if this act leads to haram with certainty (bi-al-qat‘i) or with great possibility (ghalabat al-dzann), then almost all the ‘Ulama agree that it is forbidden. This finding strengthens the assumption of the reliability of sadd al-dharai‘ as an Islamic legal argument, because it emphasizes the material-objective aspect of what happens in the field, not the intention of the actor which is difficult to measure definitely. However, further studies are needed to examine the reliability of this legal argument in providing positive and contextual solutions to various contemporary issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Zahra : Journal for Islamic and Arabic Studies 19, no. 2 (November 25, 2022). https://doi.org/10.15408/zr.v19i2.29213.

Anas, Wan Nur Izzati Wan Nor, Wan Mohd Khairul Firdaus Wan Khairuldin, and Nooramira Ghazali. “The Application of Sadd Al-Dharai’ Approach as A Mechanism for The Management of Transgender Issues in Malaysia.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 13, no. 6 (2023): 1372–78.

Barakat, Muhammad Abd al-Karim. Qa‘idat Sadd al-Dhara‘i. San’a: San’a University, t.t.

Bukhari, al-Imam al-. Sahih Al-Bukhari. Damaskus: Dar Ibn Kathir, 2002.

Bu’ud, Ahmad. Al-Ijtihad Bayna Haqaiq al-Tarikh Wa Mutatallabat al-Waqi‘. Kairo: Dar al-Salam, 2005.

Faraz, Sajida, Hafiz Mohsin Zia Qazi, Naila Rafique, Bibi Alya, and Faiza Iqbal. “Comparative Analysis of The Sadd Ul Dharai with Fath Ul Dharai, Heela (Legal Fiction), and Rule of Probihition of Means.” Revista Española de Documentación Científica 17, no. 02 (2023): 16–35.

Haq, Sansan Ziaul, and Asep Salahudin. “Moderasi ‘Di Atas’ Tekstualisme-Kontekstualisme: Metodologi Pemahaman Sunnah Yusuf al-Qaradhawi.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran Dan Hadis 6, no. 3 (October 1, 2022). https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4057.

Haroen, Nasrun. Ushul Fiqh 1. Jakarta: Logos, 1997.

Hazm, Ibn. Al-Ihkam Fi Usuli al-Ahkam. Vol. 6. Beirut: Dar al-Afaq al-Hadithah, t.t.

Imron HS, Ali. “Menerapkan Hukum Islam Yang Inovatif Dengan Metode Sadd Al-Dzari’ah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum QISTI 4, no. 1 (2010): 65–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.31942/jqi.v4i1.593.

Khalaf, ’Abd al-Wahhab. ‘Ilm Usul al-Fiqh. Kairo: Dar al-Rashid, 2008.

Mandzur, Ibn. Lisan Al-‘Arab. Vol. 6. Beirut: Dar Shadir, 2008.

Qarafi, al-Imam al-. Anwar Al-Buruq Fi-Anwa‘ al-Furuq. Vol. 2. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, 2003.

Ruzulan, Zulaipa, Budeeman Mana, Mohd Amzari Tumiran, and Mohammad Aizat Jamaludin. “Managing the Halal Food Related Issues in the Halal Food Certification Process Based on the Concept of Sadd Al-Dharai’.” Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) 8, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 429–45. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss1pp429-445.

Samara'i, Hatim Ahmad ‘Abbas al-. “Sadd Al-Dhara‘i Fi al-Shari‘ah al-Islamiyyah.” Surra Man Ra’a 4, no. 9 (2008): 18–29.

Samara'i, Muhammad Mahmud Muhammad al-. “Sadd Al-Dhara‘i Wa-Maqasidiha al-Shar‘iyyah: Tatbiqat Fiqhiyya Mu‘asirah.” Majallat Al-’Ulum al-Islamiyyah, no. 10 (H 1433): 144–96.

Shatibi, al-Imam al-. Al-Muwafaqat. Vol. 2. Beirut: Dar Ibn ’Affan, 1997.

Wan Hassan, Wan Zulkifli Bin, Luqman Hj Abdullah, and Saadan Man. “Pemikiran Imam Al-Syafi’i Mengenai Sadd Al-Dhara`i’ Sebagai Sumber Hukum.” Jurnal Fiqh 5 (December 30, 2008): 97–116. https://doi.org/10.22452/fiqh.vol5no1.5.

Zaydan, ’Abd al-Karim. Al-Wajiz Fi-Usul al-Fiqh. Baghdad: Mu’assasah al-Risalah, t.t.

Zuhaili, Wahbab al-. Ushu

Downloads

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Sansan Ziaul Haq. (2024). Menyoal Validitas Sadd Al-Dharai‘ sebagai Dalil Hukum Islam: Polemik Epistemologis Ushuliyyin: Questioning the Validity of Sadd Al-Dharai’ as an Islamic Legal Argument: Ushuliyyin Epistemological Polemics. AL-AQWAL : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 3(02), 69 - 83. https://doi.org/10.53491/alaqwal.v3i02.1035