• dicky eko prasetio Universitas Negeri Surabaya




Human Rights, Legal Standing, Judicial Review


Legal Standing is part of human rights which is related to the permission of certain parties to sue in court. In practice at the Constitutional Court, there is confirmation that legal standing is only given to Indonesian citizens, while foreigners do not get the slightest space to proceed in proceedings at the Constitutional Court. This research aims to analyze future regulatory efforts (ius constituendum) regarding limited legal standing for foreigners in the judicial review process. The term ius constituendum is used in this research to emphasize the existence of legal rules that are being initiated or aspired to be related to granting limited legal standing to foreigners in the judicial review process. This research is normative legal research by prioritizing conceptual, case and statutory approaches. The research results confirm that the modern human rights perspective mandates that the universal application of human rights requires the recognition of human rights for every person without the need to look at the background and national origin of each person. The regulation regarding legal standing at the Constitutional Court problematically only recognizes Indonesian citizens as parties who can have legal standing at the Constitutional Court. Based on the results of legal comparisons with Czechia, Germany and Mongolia, in the future it is necessary to regulate limited legal standing for foreigners to emphasize the existence of universal human rights and aim to protect foreigners from discrimination from countries that do not implement legal policies that accommodate the universalism of  human rights.


Download data is not yet available.


Daftar Pustaka


Asshidiqie, J. (2018). Perkembangan Baru Tentang Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme dalam Teori dan Praktik (1st ed.). Genta Publishing.

Hanum, C. (2020). Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Perkembangan Dan Perdebatan Masa Kini. LP2M IAIN Salatiga.

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel (3rd ed.). Mira Buana Media.

Siahaan, M. (2015). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Artikel Jurnal

Aláez-Corral, B. (2020). Constitutional Amendment and Concept of Constitution. International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 7(2), 1–28.

Alimuddin, A. (2022). Konsep Pidana Mati delam Prespektif Pancasila, Undang-Undang 1945, dan RUU KUHP di Indonesia. J-HEST: Journal of Health Education Economics Science and Technology, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36339/jhest.v5i1.76

Anam, S. (2018). The Universality of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Does it merely express Western Values? Nation State Journal of International Studies, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24076/nsjis.2018v1i1.85

Anjari, W. (2019). Kedudukan Asas Legalitas Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 003/PUU-IV/2006 dan 025/PUU-XIV/2016. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1611

Azis, M. A., Zahidi, M. S., & Pradhan, D. (2020). Synergising International Labour Laws and Human Rights for Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers. Lampung Journal of International Law, 2(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v2i2.2036

Dicky Eko Prasetio, A. I. (2022). Judicial Activism dalam Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang Ratifikasi. NEGARA HUKUM, 13(2), 258.

Dicky Eko Prasetio, F. P. D. (2021). Politik Hukum Pengujian Formil Terhadap Perubahan Konstitusi. Aktualisasi UUD Negara RI Tahun 1945 Dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara: 23 Tahun Reformasi, 101.

Dicky Eko Prasetio, H. W. (2022). Ius Constituendum Pengujian Formil Dalam Perubahan Konstitusi. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(1), 2.

Disantara, F. P., Anggono, B. D., & Efendi, A. (2022). Mendudukkan Norma Etika: Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat terhadap Relasi Etika dan Hukum. Rechtsidee, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v10i0.773

Domaradzki, S., Khvostova, M., & Pupovac, D. (2019). Karel Vasak’s Generations of Rights and the Contemporary Human Rights Discourse. Human Rights Review, 20(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-019-00565-x

Hasani, I., & Halili, H. (2022). Human Rights and Constitutionality Issues of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 406. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1927

Lahaling, H., Lasori, S. A., Makkulawuzar, K., Yunus, Y., & Salam, S. (2022). Children’s Rights In The Context Of Child Marriage In Gorontalo Province. Sasi, 28(2), 234. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i2.887

LI Xiang. (2020). Is Judicial Remedy Effective in Resolving Collective Labor Disputes in China?—Based on 622 Cases. US-China Law Review, 17(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2020.01.003

Makkulawuzar, K., Ilmar, A., Moenta, A. P., & Halim, H. (2018). The Existence of Final and Binding Ruling by the Constitutional Court in Constitutional Review. Of Law, Policy and Globalization, 79(1), 241–247.

Marks, G., & Steenbergen, M. (2022). The Social Bases of Political Parties : A New Measure and Survey. British Journal of Political Science (2022), 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000740

Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research In Indonesia: Its Origins And Approaches. ACLJ, 4(1), 5.

Nugroho, J. (2021). Restore Recognition Of Legal Pluralism As A National Law Development Model That Is Justice. Law & Justice Review Journal, 1(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.11594/lrjj.01.01.05

Prasetio, D. E. (2022). Sejarah Dan Eksistensi Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Sol Justicia, 5(2), 158–159.

Priambudi, Z., Namira, ;, Papuani, H., Prawira, R., & Iskandar, M. (2022). Reaktualisasi Hak Atas Pelayanan Kesehatan Mental Pasca Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia: Sebuah Ius Constituendum? (Re-actualization of The Right to Mental Health Services After the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: An Ius Constituendum?). Jurnal HAM, 13, 98–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2022.13.97-112

Razmetaeva, Y., Barabash, Y., & Lukianov, D. (2022). the Concept of Human Rights in the Digital Era: Changes and Consequences for Judicial Practice. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(3), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.3-a000327

Roy, S. (2021). Theory of Social Proof and Legal Compliance: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for Regulatory (Non) Compliance. German Law Journal, 22(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.5

Said, M. Y., & Nurhayati, Y. (2021). a Review on Rawls Theory of Justice. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources, 1(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v1i1.7

Sinombor, S. H. (2022). Kedudukan Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia (UDHR) dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Wasath, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47776/alwasath.v3i1.330

Widodo, H., Prasetio, D. E., & Disantara, F. P. (2020). Relasi Kekuasaan Antar Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 15(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.24554




How to Cite

prasetio, dicky eko. (2023). IUS CONSTITUENDUM LEGAL STANDING BAGI WNA TERKAIT PROSES JUDICIAL REVIEW DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA. HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Integrasi Peradilan, 2(1), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v2i1.723