TINJAUAN YURIDIS KETIDAK PATUHAN PEJABAT NEGARA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (Studi Kasus Dalam Perkara No. 2/G/2022/PTUN.JPR)

Authors

  • Marwah Marwah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua
  • Safiuddin Safiuddin Institut Agama Islam Negeri Fattahul Muluk Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v5i1.2057

Keywords:

Non Compliance of State Officials, Putusan PTUN Jayapura, Execution of Decisions

Abstract

State Administrative Court decisions that have permanent legal force must be implemented by state officials, as stipulated in Law No. 5 concerning the PTUN and Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. However, in case No. 2/G/2022/PTUN.JPR, the decision has not been implemented by the officials concerned. This indicates non-compliance with court decisions. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the factors of officials' non-compliance with PTUN decisions and analyze the PTUN's efforts to encourage the implementation of decisions. This study uses a normative-empirical juridical approach to examine the implementation of legal provisions in practice, with data obtained through literature studies, document studies, and interviews. The results of the study indicate that factors for non-compliance with decisions are due to a lack of legal awareness and unclear sanctions. The efforts made by the Jayapura PTUN in encouraging the implementation of decisions are in accordance with applicable execution regulations, however, due to the limited authority of the PTUN, which only acts as a supervisor of decisions, there are no direct coercive measures. This situation indicates that court decisions have not been implemented effectively and still face obstacles that could potentially harm public rights. To improve official compliance with decisions, it is recommended to establish an executive body, strengthen sanctions stipulated in laws and regulations, increase legal awareness through regular education and guidance, and transparently monitor the implementation of court decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amri, A. (2023). Penerapan Asas Peradilan : Studi Kekurangan Hakim Di Pengadilan Agama Sentani. Perspektif Hukum, 23(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v23i2.203

Amri, & Dkk. (2016). Hukum Perdata. Widina Bhakti Persada.

Arikunto, S. (2022). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Asep Misbach Alfaridzi, Muhammad Hilmi Naufal Aflah, dan Najmi Rabbani, “Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan PTUN (Analisis Pelaksanaan Putusan PTUN pada Kasus Perizinan Pertambangan PT. TMS),” Dinamika Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2023), DOI: https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v24i2.932

Asnani, M. . (2025). Rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pengabaian Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Oleh Pejabat Administrasi Negara Berbasis Keadilan Bermartabat. In Bandung: Mandar Maju. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.

Azzahra, Farida, “Pemberlakuan Sanksi Administratif: Bentuk Upaya Paksa Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Pejabat Atas Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Teori Efektivitas Hukum),” Binamulia Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2020), hlm. 305–320, DOI: https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v9i2.368

Dobinson, I., & Johns, F. (2017). Legal research as qualitative research. Research Methods for Law.

Dodu, A. B. D. (2017). Penerapan Regulasi Politik Kampanye Hitam: Studi Kasus Pada Pilkada Kabupaten Banggai Tahun 2015. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 2(1), 52–60.

Faizal Amrul Muttaqin, & Wahyu Saputra. (2019). Budaya Hukum Malu Sebagai Nilai Vital Terwujudnya Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 1(2), 187-207–207.

Fauziyah, B. N., Yono, Y., & Kosim, A. M. (2022). Sanksi Hukum Bagi Suami Yang Menelantarkan Anak Pasca Perceraian (Studi Komparatif Antara Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif). Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 6(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v6i2.1427

Handoyo, S., & Fakhriza, M. (2018). Efektivitas Hukum terhadap Kepatuhan Perusahaan Dalam Kepesertaan BPJS Kesehatan. Jurnal De Facto, 4(2), 134–151.

Hardani. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. CV. Pustaka Ilmu.

Ilyas, I., Abbas, S., & Jauhari, I. (2018). Efektivitas Peran Hakim Sebagai Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 1(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v1i1.12241

Isnantiana, N. I. (2017). Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina, 18(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v18i2.1920

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Petunjuk Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang bekekuatan Hukum Tetap, Nomor 01/KM. TUN/HK2.7/Juklak/VII/2024. Jakarta, 2024.

MANAN, A. (2011). EKSEKUSI & Lelang Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2007),

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (edisi ke-3). Sage Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosda Karya.

Monitoring Evaluasi Eksekusi Direktoriat Pembinaan Tenaga Teknis dan Administrasi Peradilan TUN, https://eksekusi-ptun.djmt.id/, diakses pada tanggal 15, Januari, 2026.

Muhajir, Suardi, ddk“Pengetahuan Hukum, Pemahaman Hukum, Sikap Hukum Dan Perilaku Hukum Pengemudi Ojek Online Dalam Berlalu Lintas Di Kecamatan Rappocini Kota Makassar,” Jurnal Pendidikan PKN (Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan) 3, no. 2 (2022): 136

Muhamad Sabir, Rahman, dkk “Analisis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata,” Julia Jurnal Litigasi Amsir 10, no. 1 (2022): 43, http://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/.

Rahman, Muhamad Sabir, dkk. (2022). Analisis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Putusan (Eksekusi) Perkara Perdata. Julia Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 10(1), 43.

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2016

Soekanto, S. (1988). Efektivitas Hukum dan Penerapan Sanksi. CV. Ramadja Karya.

Soekanto, S. (2007). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tom R. Tyler, Why People Obey the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006

Wahyudi, Ari, “Eksekutorial Putusan PTUN Sebagai Lembaga Yudikatif,” Politea: Jurnal Politik Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021), DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/politea.v4i1.349

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Marwah, M., & Safiuddin, S. (2026). TINJAUAN YURIDIS KETIDAK PATUHAN PEJABAT NEGARA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA (Studi Kasus Dalam Perkara No. 2/G/2022/PTUN.JPR). HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Integrasi Peradilan, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v5i1.2057