A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE ROLE OF COMMERCIAL COURTS IN INDONESIA'S RELIGIOUS JUSTICE SYSTEM

Authors

  • Fauzan Arrasyid Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v3i2.1683

Keywords:

Islamic bank liquidation, judicial authority, Commercial Court,

Abstract

The repositioning of jurisdiction for resolving the liquidation of Islamic banks from the Commercial Court to the Religious Court is a crucial issue in the reform of Indonesia’s Islamic economic judicial system. This study aims to identify the inaccuracy of the forum for resolving Islamic bank liquidation cases under the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court. The approach used is normative juridical. The results show that the dominance of the Commercial Court in Islamic bank liquidation cases is contrary to the principle of lex specialis and Constitutional Court Decision No. 93/PUU-X/2012, and ignores the principles of sharia justice. In addition, the non-use of the Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES), the absence of reference to Dewan Syariah Nasional-Majelis Ulama Indonesia fatwas, and the absence of sharia expert witnesses in evidentiary practice, widened the gap between sharia norms and litigation mechanisms. The jurisdictional fragmentation that occurs indicates a systemic failure to integrate the values, procedures and forums of sharia economic law into the national legal system. This research confirms that the repositioning of authority to the Religious Courts needs to be accompanied by cross-regulatory harmonization, strengthening institutional capacity, and affirmation of the constitutional rights of Muslims in choosing religious-based justice forums. This research is expected to be an important contribution to the renewal of a national justice system that is inclusive, responsive and valuable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamudi, I. A. (2023). Politik Hukum Di Indonesia: Regulasi Perbankan Syariah Dalam Tata Hukum Indonesia. AL-BALAD : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam, 3(2), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.59259/ab.v3i2.61

Apriantoro, M. S., Sekartaji, S. I., & Suryaningsih, A. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan Ekonomi Syariah Perspektif Ibnu Rusyd Al-Qurthubi Dalam Bidayatul Mujtahid Wa Nihayatul Muqtashid. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 7(3), 1400–1408.

Faizah, N., & Azzahra, D. (2022). Kompetensi Pengadilan Niaga Terhadap Kepailitan Debitor Berdasarkan Wanprestasi Akad Pembiayaan Syariah (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 26/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Mdn Tentang Kepailitan PT Baja Agung). Al-Mizan, 6(2), 126–139.

Kurrokhman, T. (2016). Transformasi Ekonomi Islam Dalam Sistem Hukum Perbankan Nasional Dan Problematika Kewenangan Absolut Peradilan Agama. EDUKA : Jurnal Pendidikan, Hukum, Dan Bisnis, 1(2), 84–98.

Mukhlis, M. (2020). Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Antara Peradilan Agama dan Peradilan Niaga. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 12(1), 105–118.

Najib, A. (2019). Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 3(26), 564–583.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012.

KNEKS. (2021). Masterplan Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia 2019–2024. Komite Nasional Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-02

How to Cite

Fauzan Arrasyid. (2025). A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE ROLE OF COMMERCIAL COURTS IN INDONESIA’S RELIGIOUS JUSTICE SYSTEM. HUNILA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Integrasi Peradilan, 3(2), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.53491/hunila.v3i2.1683